image
Man’s Injuries from Medical Transport Sound in Ordinary Negligence
Michigan Court of Appeals Panel Ruling
- Man injured while being unloaded from an ambulance
- Claims sound in ordinary negligence, not medical malpractice
- Michigan Court of Appeals panel supports the claim
Understanding the Difference Between Ordinary Negligence and Medical Malpractice
Ordinary Negligence
Ordinary negligence refers to a failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. In this case, the man’s injuries from being unloaded from the ambulance are considered ordinary negligence.
Medical Malpractice
Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional’s actions deviate from the accepted standard of care, causing harm to a patient. The court ruled that the man’s injuries were not a result of medical malpractice.
In a recent case, a Michigan Court of Appeals panel has ruled that a man’s injuries sustained while being unloaded from an ambulance are due to ordinary negligence, not medical malpractice. This decision highlights the importance of understanding the difference between the two types of negligence and how they can impact a personal injury claim.
As a victim of a motor vehicle accident or any other incident involving negligence, it is crucial to consult with a knowledgeable lawyer to determine the appropriate course of action. Law Referral states, “When faced with a potential negligence claim, it’s essential to ask questions like, ‘Is this a case of ordinary negligence or medical malpractice?’ and ‘What are my legal options?'”
Engaging with a skilled car accident or personal injury lawyer can help you navigate the complexities of your case and ensure that you receive the compensation you deserve. Don’t hesitate to reach out to a legal professional for guidance and support in your time of need.
Orginal article: Link To Article – provided by Legal Referral