Understanding Indiana’s Modified Comparative Fault System in Car Accidents
Stephenson Rife Law Explains the Settlement Process
Indianapolis, September 28, 2023
- Indiana follows a modified comparative fault system in car accident cases
- Settlement process involves determining fault and calculating damages
- Plaintiff’s recovery reduced by their percentage of fault
- Recovery barred if plaintiff is 51% or more at fault
- Insurance companies often use this system to minimize payouts
- Legal representation crucial for fair compensation
In Indiana, car accident settlements are governed by a modified comparative fault system. This means that the amount of compensation a plaintiff can receive is directly affected by their percentage of fault in the accident. If the plaintiff is found to be 51% or more at fault, they are barred from recovering any damages. Insurance companies often use this system to their advantage, attempting to minimize payouts by assigning a higher percentage of fault to the injured party.
Given the complexities of Indiana’s modified comparative fault system, it is essential for those involved in car accidents to seek legal representation. A skilled attorney can help navigate the settlement process, ensuring that their client receives fair compensation for their injuries and losses. Don’t let insurance companies take advantage of you; consult with a knowledgeable lawyer to protect your rights and secure the compensation you deserve.
Orginal article: Link To Article – provided by Legal Referral